Baird v. Union Mutual Life Insurance

177 N.W. 156, 104 Neb. 352, 1920 Neb. LEXIS 134
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided March 17, 1920·No. No. 20529·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Motion to modify judgment. Former opinion reported in 103 Neb. 609.

Defendant tendered to plaintiff $3,112.20, and demanded a receipt in full and the execution of a formal release and return of a policy. In view of the decisions, the tender by defendant was conditional and was therefore vitiated. Schrandt v. Young, 62 Neb. 254; Wilkins v. Redding, 70 Neb. 182; Parker v. Supreme Tent, K. M. O. W., 191 Mo. App. 508; 38 Cyc. 154.

Our former judgment of reversal is therefore modified to permit a recovery of interest, costs and attorney’s fees by plaintiff. As modified herein, our former judgment of reversal is adhered to.

Judgment of Reversal Adhered to as Modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baird v. Union Mutual Life Insurance, 177 N.W. 156, 104 Neb. 352, 1920 Neb. LEXIS 134 (Neb. 1920).

177 N.W. 156 (Baird v. Union Mutual Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Halliday v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
404 P.2d 634 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1965)
Bennett v. Emerald Service, Inc.
59 N.W.2d 171 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1953)
Adams v. Adams
57 N.W.2d 131 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1953)
McCrary v. New York Life Ins. Co.
84 F.2d 790 (Eighth Circuit, 1936)
Jensen v. Lincoln Hail Insurance
249 N.W. 94 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1933)
Gipson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
199 N.W. 541 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1924)