Baird v. Thayer
This text of 8 Blackf. 146 (Baird v. Thayer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ASSUMPSIT by Martin Thayer, assignee of Isaac Fisher, against Joseph Baird on an instrument of writing as follows, which was assigned by Fisher to the plaintiff: “ Rec’d May, 1840, of W. B. Tapscott one carriage to sell, and pay the amount over to Isaac Fisher when collected, which carriage I have sold on time, and did agree to pay the amount of said carriage (one hundred and forty-five dollars) as above stated to Isaac Fisher by the express order of the above-named Tapscott. Joseph Baird’.” Held, that the instrument contained no promise on which an action would lie. Ephraims et al. v. Murdock, 1 Blackf. 10.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Blackf. 146, 1846 Ind. LEXIS 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baird-v-thayer-ind-1846.