Home/Supreme Court of Delaware/Baird v. State

Baird v. State

976 A.2d 170, 2009 WL 1847736
Supreme Court of Delaware·Decided June 29, 2009·No. 218, 2009·Published

Opinion

STEVEN J. BAIRD, JR., Petitioner Below, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF DELAWARE, Respondent Below, Appellee.

No. 218, 2009.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Submitted: June 23, 2009.
Decided: June 29, 2009.

ORDER

HENRY DuPONT RIDGELY, Justice

This 29th day of June 2009, the Court has considered the Clerk's notice directing that appellant, Steven J. Baird, Jr., show cause pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) why this appeal should not be dismissed for Baird's failure to diligently prosecute the appeal by not arranging for payment to the court reporter of the transcript ordered for the appeal. Baird has not responded to the notice to show cause. Baird's failure to respond to the notice to show cause is deemed to be his consent to the dismissal of the appeal.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2) and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baird v. State, 976 A.2d 170, 2009 WL 1847736 (Del. 2009).

976 A.2d 170 (Baird v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.