Baird v. Stanley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Baird v. Stanley

154 P. 857, 153 P. 857, 54 Okla. 115

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedDecember 14, 1915

Docket5518

StatusPublished

This text of 154 P. 857 (Baird v. Stanley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baird v. Stanley, 154 P. 857, 153 P. 857, 54 Okla. 115 (Okla. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

RUMMONS, C.

The defendants in error have filed no brief in this cause, and no excuse has been offered for their failure to file brief. We have examined the brief filed, and find that the authorities therein cited seem to reasonably sustain the contention of plaintiff in error and his assignments of error. In accordance with a. long line of decisions of this court, we will not take the time to search for authorities to sustain the judgment of the court below. This cause should therefore .be reversed and remanded.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

RUMMONS, C.

The defendants in error have filed no brief in this cause, and no excuse has been offered for their failure to file brief. We have examined the brief filed, and find that the authorities therein cited seem to reasonably sustain the contention of plaintiff in error and his assignments of error. In accordance with a. long line of decisions of this court, we will not take the time to search for authorities to sustain the judgment of the court below. This cause should therefore .be reversed and remanded.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

154 P. 857, 153 P. 857, 54 Okla. 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baird-v-stanley-okla-1915.