Baird v. Powers

22 N.E. 796, 131 Ill. 66
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 26, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 22 N.E. 796 (Baird v. Powers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baird v. Powers, 22 N.E. 796, 131 Ill. 66 (Ill. 1889).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Scholfield

delivered the opinion of the Court:

It has been held many times in this court, that where the evidence is not contained in depositions duly taken and filed in the case, and there is no report of a master in chancery, embodying the evidence taken and heard on the trial, on file in the case, it is incumbent on the party seeking to sustain the decree to preserve the evidence in the record, either by a recital in the decree of the facts proved, or by a bill of exceptions, or certificate of evidence reciting the evidence given on the hearing, filed in the case, and thus made part of the record, and that when no evidence has been preserved sustaining the decree, in any of the modes indicated, it must be reversed. (White v. Morrison, 11 Ill. 365; Ward v. Owens et al. 12 id. 283; Waugh et al. v. Robbins, 33 id. 181; Mason et al. v. Bair, id. 194; Smith v. Newland, 40 id. 100.) The court here finds “that the complainant is entitled to the relief in his said bill of complaint and supplemental bill of complaint prayed for;” yet, so far as the record discloses, this is without a particle of evidence to warrant it.

The decree is reversed and the cause remanded.'

Decree reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Quigley v. Quigley
268 Ill. App. 130 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1932)
Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Garrett
99 N.E. 643 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1912)
Clark v. Evans
138 Ill. App. 56 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1907)
McNicholas v. Tinsler
127 Ill. App. 381 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1906)
Chapman v. Kane
97 Ill. App. 567 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1901)
Wollschlager v. McEldowney
96 Ill. App. 34 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1901)
Crawford-Adsit Co. v. Bell
95 Ill. App. 427 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1901)
Rump v. Rump
94 Ill. App. 582 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1901)
Adamski v. Wieczorek
93 Ill. App. 357 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1901)
Rogan v. Eads
92 Ill. App. 157 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1900)
Jele v. Lemberger
45 N.E. 279 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1896)
Ricketts v. Chicago Permanent Building & Loan Ass'n
67 Ill. App. 71 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1896)
Kransz v. Kagebein
60 Ill. App. 430 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1895)
Adair v. Adair
54 Ill. App. 502 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1894)
Van Meter v. Thomas
54 Ill. App. 580 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1894)
Bradner Smith & Co. v. Mason
54 Ill. App. 258 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1894)
Brechon v. Duis
39 Ill. App. 258 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 N.E. 796, 131 Ill. 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baird-v-powers-ill-1889.