Baird v. Peter

4 Munf. 76
Supreme Court of Virginia·Decided October 21, 1813·Published·Cited by 15 cases

Opinion

the president pronounced the court’s opinion, that, although prior to the act of 1805, gy (2) it would have been irregular, in a case like the present, to have rendered judgment for interest, when none was demanded in the declaration; yet, that act having made it the duty of the clerk to issue execution for the principal sum due, with interest from the time the bill became payable until payment thereof, it was not error for the judgment of the court to conform thereto; and this the rather because po injury is thereby done to the party defendant. On this ground, the court affirms the judgment of the District Court,

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baird v. Peter, 4 Munf. 76 (Va. 1813).

4 Munf. 76 (Baird v. Peter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fred v. Dixon
27 Va. 541 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1876)
Paine v. Tutwiler
27 Va. 440 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1876)
Ward v. Churn
18 Va. 801 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1868)
Davis' Adm'rs v. Mead
13 Gratt. 118 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1856)
Buckingham v. Bailey
12 Miss. 538 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1845)
Metcalfe v. Battaile
1 Va. 191 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1821)
Brooke v. Gordon
6 Va. 177 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1800)