Baird v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Baird v. New York City Housing Authority

102 A.D.2d 704, 476 N.Y.S.2d 257, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18863

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 7, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 102 A.D.2d 704 (Baird v. New York City Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baird v. New York City Housing Authority, 102 A.D.2d 704, 476 N.Y.S.2d 257, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18863 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Con. G. Cholakis, J.), entered on June 10,1983, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered solely on the damages awarded to plaintiff Kwanza Baird and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, unless said plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon her attorney of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in her favor to $50,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff Kwanza Baird so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and decreased, is unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Ross, Milonas, Kassal and Alexander, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Con. G. Cholakis, J.), entered on June 10,1983, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered solely on the damages awarded to plaintiff Kwanza Baird and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, unless said plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon her attorney of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in her favor to $50,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff Kwanza Baird so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and decreased, is unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Ross, Milonas, Kassal and Alexander, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 A.D.2d 704, 476 N.Y.S.2d 257, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baird-v-new-york-city-housing-authority-nyappdiv-1984.