Baird v. Maguire
This text of 271 P.2d 233 (Baird v. Maguire) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor’ of the defendants in a claim and delivery action involving the possession of an automobile.
The appellants contend that the evidence is not sufficient to sustain this judgment. The record before this court does not include either a settled statement of facts or a reporter’s transcript, of the oral proceedings before the trial court. Under these circumstances on appeal it must be presumed that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the judgment.
The judgment is affirmed.
Hilliard, J., and Mitchell, J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
271 P.2d 233, 125 Cal. App. Supp. 2d 907, 1954 Cal. App. LEXIS 1971, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baird-v-maguire-calappdeptsuper-1954.