Baird v. Huston
227 So. 2d 337
This text of 227 So. 2d 337 (Baird v. Huston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Baird v. Huston, 227 So. 2d 337 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).
Opinion
Our review of the record convinces us that the issue of implied consent was properly a jury issue and accordingly we affirm on the authority of Thomas v. Atlantic Associates, Inc., 226 So.2d 100, Supreme Court Case, opinion filed July 30, 1969, and Whalen v. Hill, Fla.App.1969, 219 So.2d 727. The other appellate points have been examined and found to be without merit.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Thomas v. Atlantic Associates, Inc.
226 So. 2d 100 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1969)
Whalen v. Hill
219 So. 2d 727 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
227 So. 2d 337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baird-v-huston-fladistctapp-1969.