Baird v. Glick

82 Ind. 602
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1882·No. No. 8152·Published

Opinion

Woods, J.

The appellant complains of an instruction, but, except a recital in the motion for a new trial, there is no evidence in the record that the instruction was given. Adams v. Stringer, 78 Ind. 175.

The principal question of fact in the case was whether or not a sale of a stock of goods was made for the purpose of defrauding creditors; and the jury having found that it was not fraudulent, .we are asked to set the finding aside. If a case be conceivable, wherein we would be justified, under the rule which governs our action upon questions of fact, in setting such a verdict aside, this is not such a case.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baird v. Glick, 82 Ind. 602 (Ind. 1882).

82 Ind. 602 (Baird v. Glick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adams v. Stringer
78 Ind. 175 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)