Baird v. Glick

82 Ind. 602
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1882
DocketNo. 8152
StatusPublished

This text of 82 Ind. 602 (Baird v. Glick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baird v. Glick, 82 Ind. 602 (Ind. 1882).

Opinion

Woods, J.

The appellant complains of an instruction, but, except a recital in the motion for a new trial, there is no evidence in the record that the instruction was given. Adams v. Stringer, 78 Ind. 175.

The principal question of fact in the case was whether or not a sale of a stock of goods was made for the purpose of defrauding creditors; and the jury having found that it was not fraudulent, .we are asked to set the finding aside. If a case be conceivable, wherein we would be justified, under the rule which governs our action upon questions of fact, in setting such a verdict aside, this is not such a case.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adams v. Stringer
78 Ind. 175 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 Ind. 602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baird-v-glick-ind-1882.