Baird v. George

Missouri Court of Appeals

Baird v. George

30 Mo. App. 505, 1888 Mo. App. LEXIS 300

DecidedApril 24, 1888

StatusPublished

This text of 30 Mo. App. 505 (Baird v. George) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baird v. George, 30 Mo. App. 505, 1888 Mo. App. LEXIS 300 (Mo. Ct. App. 1888).

Pincite

Opinions

Rombauer, P. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The record in this cause is in such condition as to. present nothing for review. The cause was tried before the court sitting as a jury, on conflicting evidence, and: judgment was rendered in favor of defendant. No: exceptions to the admission of evidence are saved, and no instructions were asked or given. Judgment was-rendered January 8, 1887. The record recites that the-motion for new trial -vpas filed on the — day of March,. 1887, although the clerk’s endorsement shows it to have been filed June 8, 1887. As motions for new trial must be filed within four days after judgment, the motion thus filed was unwarranted in either event, and the-court committed no error in overruling it. The only-assignment of error filed in this court is that* the verdict is against the weight of evidence.

This statement shows that the only disposition we can make of the appeal is to affirm the judgment. So ordered.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rombauer, P. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The record in this cause is in such condition as to. present nothing for review. The cause was tried before the court sitting as a jury, on conflicting evidence, and: judgment was rendered in favor of defendant. No: exceptions to the admission of evidence are saved, and no instructions were asked or given. Judgment was-rendered January 8, 1887. The record recites that the-motion for new trial -vpas filed on the — day of March,. 1887, although the clerk’s endorsement shows it to have been filed June 8, 1887. As motions for new trial must be filed within four days after judgment, the motion thus filed was unwarranted in either event, and the-court committed no error in overruling it. The only-assignment of error filed in this court is that* the verdict is against the weight of evidence.

This statement shows that the only disposition we can make of the appeal is to affirm the judgment. So ordered.

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 Mo. App. 505, 1888 Mo. App. LEXIS 300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baird-v-george-moctapp-1888.