Baird v. First National Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Baird v. First National Bank

162 S.E.2d 811, 118 Ga. App. 107, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 1322

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 27, 1968

Docket43744

StatusPublished

This text of 162 S.E.2d 811 (Baird v. First National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baird v. First National Bank, 162 S.E.2d 811, 118 Ga. App. 107, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 1322 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Quillian, Judge.

“Where after trial a motion for new trial is filed and overruled by the trial court such judgment estab[108]*108lishes as the law of the case that the questions raised by such motion for new trial are without merit unless such judgment is enumerated as error upon appeal.” Hill v. Willis, 224 Ga. 263 (4) (161 SE2d 281); Crowley v. State, 118 Ga. App. 7. Since in the case sub judice the judgment on motion for new trial was not appealed from, the law of the case was established by the overruling of the general grounds of the motion for new trial, and hence the appellant’s enumerations of error based solely on the same issue raised by those grounds do not show reversible error.

Submitted June 4, 1968 Decided June 27, 1968. S. Stonecypher, for appellant. John W. Bland, Jr., for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, P. J., and Hall, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quillian, Judge.

“Where after trial a motion for new trial is filed and overruled by the trial court such judgment estab[108]*108lishes as the law of the case that the questions raised by such motion for new trial are without merit unless such judgment is enumerated as error upon appeal.” Hill v. Willis, 224 Ga. 263 (4) (161 SE2d 281); Crowley v. State, 118 Ga. App. 7. Since in the case sub judice the judgment on motion for new trial was not appealed from, the law of the case was established by the overruling of the general grounds of the motion for new trial, and hence the appellant’s enumerations of error based solely on the same issue raised by those grounds do not show reversible error.

Submitted June 4, 1968 Decided June 27, 1968. S. Stonecypher, for appellant. John W. Bland, Jr., for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, P. J., and Hall, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 S.E.2d 811, 118 Ga. App. 107, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 1322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baird-v-first-national-bank-gactapp-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack