Baird v. Continental Insurance Co.
This text of 237 So. 2d 206 (Baird v. Continental Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Although agreeing that the trial court correctly granted the defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings, as same were then constituted, we feel that the justice of the cause requires that plaintiffs be given an opportunity to amend their complaint so that it might be determined if a proper way exists whereby plaintiffs may avoid the defects revealed in their complaint. See Rule 1.010 and Rule 1.190(e) Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 30 F.S.A. and Sea Shore Motel Corporation v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, Fourth District Court of Appeal, 233 So.2d 651, opinion filed March 16, 1970. We do not suggest, inferentially or otherwise, that their effort will be necessarily successful. We determine only that the rules should not be so finely drawn as to prohibit a second chance to plead an acceptable cause of action under the circumstances of this case where the pro[207]*207cedure used was tantamount to that of a motion to dismiss.
Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
237 So. 2d 206, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baird-v-continental-insurance-co-fladistctapp-1970.