Baird v. Commissioner

Board of Tax Appeals

Baird v. Commissioner

4 B.T.A. 399, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2284

CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals

DecidedJuly 27, 1926

DocketDocket No. 9393.

StatusPublished

This text of 4 B.T.A. 399 (Baird v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baird v. Commissioner, 4 B.T.A. 399, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2284 (bta 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

[400]*400OPINION.

Aetjndell:

For the reasons set forth in the Appeal of Walter T. Smith, this day decided, ante, 897, we are satisfied that the value of the bonds of the Bowman Hotel Corporation, when received by the petitioner in June, 1919, was not to exceed 50 per cent of their par value. No evidence was offered as to the value of the notes of the Central Building Co. and the finding of the Commissioner is consequently approved.

Order of redetermination will be entered on 15 days' notice, under Rule 50.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[400]*400OPINION.

Aetjndell:

For the reasons set forth in the Appeal of Walter T. Smith, this day decided, ante, 897, we are satisfied that the value of the bonds of the Bowman Hotel Corporation, when received by the petitioner in June, 1919, was not to exceed 50 per cent of their par value. No evidence was offered as to the value of the notes of the Central Building Co. and the finding of the Commissioner is consequently approved.

Order of redetermination will be entered on 15 days' notice, under Rule 50.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 B.T.A. 399, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baird-v-commissioner-bta-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack