Baird v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe

381 F. App'x 628
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJune 21, 2010
DocketNo. 09-3787
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 381 F. App'x 628 (Baird v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baird v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe, 381 F. App'x 628 (8th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Daniel R. Baird appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his civil action. Upon de novo review, see Meyer v. City of Joplin, 281 F.3d 759, 760 (per curiam) (8th Cir.2002), we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons the district court stated. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Olga Echerivel
500 F. App'x 568 (Eighth Circuit, 2013)
Baird v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.
178 L. Ed. 2d 415 (Supreme Court, 2010)
Echerivel v. United States
178 L. Ed. 2d 339 (Supreme Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
381 F. App'x 628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baird-v-burlington-northern-santa-fe-ca8-2010.