Baird v. Bonta
This text of Baird v. Bonta (Baird v. Bonta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 15 2026 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARK BAIRD, No. 24-565 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:19-cv-00617-KJM-AC Eastern District of California, v. Sacramento ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as ORDER Attorney General of the State of California,
Defendant - Appellee.
MURGUIA, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that
this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 40(c)
and Circuit Rule 40-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Baird v. Bonta, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baird-v-bonta-ca9-2026.