Bair v. Bair

1948 OK 262, 200 P.2d 756, 201 Okla. 40, 1948 Okla. LEXIS 520
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedDecember 7, 1948
DocketNo. 33018
StatusPublished

This text of 1948 OK 262 (Bair v. Bair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bair v. Bair, 1948 OK 262, 200 P.2d 756, 201 Okla. 40, 1948 Okla. LEXIS 520 (Okla. 1948).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant has appealed from a judgment entered against him in the trial court, and on June 24, 1947, he filed his brief. The authorities cited therein reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendant in error has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances, as stated in Osborne v. Osborne, 163 Okla. 273, 21 P. 2d 1056, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court, but the cause will be reversed and remanded, with directions.

The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to vacate the judgment for the plaintiff and enter judgment for the defendant in accordance with the prayer of the petition in error.

HURST, C. J., DAVISON, V. C. J., and BAYLESS, WELCH, CORN, GIBSON, ARNOLD, and LUTTRELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Osborne v. Osborne
1933 OK 306 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1948 OK 262, 200 P.2d 756, 201 Okla. 40, 1948 Okla. LEXIS 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bair-v-bair-okla-1948.