Bair v. Adams Express Co.
66 Pa. Super. 106, 1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 203
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 13, 1917·No. Appeal, No. 134·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The opinion of Judge Hassler in discharging the rule for a new trial, fully answers the questions raised by appellant. Whatever of conflict there may be between Trace v. R. R. Co., 26 Pa. Superior Ct. 466, and Ridge v. Erie R. R., 54 Pa. Superior Ct. 602, must be held to be settled by the latter case in favor of the conclusions therein reached.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bair v. Adams Express Co., 66 Pa. Super. 106, 1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 203 (Pa. Ct. App. 1917).
66 Pa. Super. 106 (Bair v. Adams Express Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Turek, Admrx. v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.
64 A.2d 779 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1949)
American Railway Express Co. v. Ewing Thomas Converting Co.
292 F. 335 (Third Circuit, 1923)
Atlantic Refining Co. v. Pennsylvania Railroad
113 A. 570 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)