Bair v. Adams Express Co.
66 Pa. Super. 106, 1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 203
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 13, 1917
DocketAppeal, No. 134
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 66 Pa. Super. 106 (Bair v. Adams Express Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bair v. Adams Express Co., 66 Pa. Super. 106, 1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 203 (Pa. Ct. App. 1917).
Opinion
The opinion of Judge Hassler in discharging the rule for a new trial, fully answers the questions raised by appellant. Whatever of conflict there may be between Trace v. R. R. Co., 26 Pa. Superior Ct. 466, and Ridge v. Erie R. R., 54 Pa. Superior Ct. 602, must be held to be settled by the latter case in favor of the conclusions therein reached.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Turek, Admrx. v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.
64 A.2d 779 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1949)
American Railway Express Co. v. Ewing Thomas Converting Co.
292 F. 335 (Third Circuit, 1923)
Atlantic Refining Co. v. Pennsylvania Railroad
113 A. 570 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
66 Pa. Super. 106, 1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bair-v-adams-express-co-pasuperct-1917.