Baioff v. Miami Shores Village

6 Fla. Supp. 2d 160
CourtCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida
DecidedDecember 10, 1982
DocketCase No. 81 -190 AP
StatusPublished

This text of 6 Fla. Supp. 2d 160 (Baioff v. Miami Shores Village) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baioff v. Miami Shores Village, 6 Fla. Supp. 2d 160 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1982).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Although we are of the opinion that appellant’s due process rights were probably violated by the procedures followed by the Miami Shores Village Code Enforcement Board, it is not necessary to decide this case on that point.

The record discloses that appellant cannot be prohibited from using [161]*161her home as a rooming house because of the doctrine of Non-conforming use. See Bemas Corporation v. City of Jacksonville, 298 So.2d 467 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), Milling v. Berg, 104 So.2d 658 (Fla. 2d DCA 1958), City of Miami v. Lithgow, 12 So.2d 380 (Fla. 1943), and Daoud v. City of Miami Beach, 780 2d 585 (Fla. 1942).

REVERSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

The City of Miami v. Lithgow
12 So. 2d 380 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1943)
Milling v. Berg
104 So. 2d 658 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
Bemas Corp. v. City of Jacksonville
298 So. 2d 467 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Fla. Supp. 2d 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baioff-v-miami-shores-village-flacirct-1982.