Bainton v. Board of Education

57 Misc. 2d 140, 292 N.Y.S.2d 229, 1968 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1437
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedMay 29, 1968
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 57 Misc. 2d 140 (Bainton v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bainton v. Board of Education, 57 Misc. 2d 140, 292 N.Y.S.2d 229, 1968 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1437 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is undisputed that two of the jurors made separate and unauthorized visits to the scene of the accident. This was highly improper and so inherently prejudicial as to require a new trial. The rule that a jury may not impeach its own verdict is no longer applicable in respect to misconduct outside the juryroom (People v. De Lucia, 20 N Y 2d 275; cf. Parker v. Gladden, 385 U. S. 363).

The order should be unanimously affirmed, with $25 costs.

Concur— McDonald, P. J., Groat and Schwartzwald, JJ.

Order affirmed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Varano v. FORBA Holdings, LLC
42 Misc. 3d 303 (New York Supreme Court, 2013)
Lopez v. Sears Roebuck and Co.
777 P.2d 715 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 Misc. 2d 140, 292 N.Y.S.2d 229, 1968 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bainton-v-board-of-education-nyappterm-1968.