Bains v. Bains

20 So. 2d 103, 246 Ala. 249, 1944 Ala. LEXIS 470
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided December 14, 1944·No. 6 Div. 255.·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAMi

The majority, consisting of GARDNER, C. J., THOMAS, FOSTER, LIVINGSTON, STAKELY, and SIMPSON, JJ., are of opinion that the facts alleged, which will appear in the reporter’s statement of the case, show as a matter of law that the wife voluntarily abandoned the husband, and that the case is due to be affirmed. It is so ordered by the court.

Affirmed.

All concur, except BROWN, J., who dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bains v. Bains, 20 So. 2d 103, 246 Ala. 249, 1944 Ala. LEXIS 470 (Ala. 1944).

20 So. 2d 103 (Bains v. Bains) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Higgins v. Higgins
130 So. 677 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1930)
Perry v. Perry
162 So. 101 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1935)
Tillery v. Tillery
115 So. 27 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1927)
Duckworth v. Duckworth's Adm'r
35 Ala. 70 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1859)
Martin v. Martin
55 So. 632 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1911)
Brown v. Brown
59 So. 48 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1912)
Board of Revenue v. Merrill
69 So. 971 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1915)