Bainbridge v. Merchants & Miners Transportation Co.
159 A. 19, 306 Pa. 204, 1932 Pa. LEXIS 423
Opinion
The order of the court below dismissing this action for want of jurisdiction is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Finletter, which clearly and adequately discusses the question involved.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bainbridge v. Merchants & Miners Transportation Co., 159 A. 19, 306 Pa. 204, 1932 Pa. LEXIS 423 (Pa. 1932).
159 A. 19 (Bainbridge v. Merchants & Miners Transportation Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Claseman v. Feeney
300 N.W. 818 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1941)
Bainbridge v. Merchants & Miners Transportation Co.
287 U.S. 278 (Supreme Court, 1932)