Bainbridge v. Merchants & Miners Transportation Co.
159 A. 19, 306 Pa. 204, 1932 Pa. LEXIS 423
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 5, 1932
DocketAppeal, 136
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 159 A. 19 (Bainbridge v. Merchants & Miners Transportation Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bainbridge v. Merchants & Miners Transportation Co., 159 A. 19, 306 Pa. 204, 1932 Pa. LEXIS 423 (Pa. 1932).
Opinion
The order of the court below dismissing this action for want of jurisdiction is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Finletter, which clearly and adequately discusses the question involved.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Claseman v. Feeney
300 N.W. 818 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1941)
Bainbridge v. Merchants & Miners Transportation Co.
287 U.S. 278 (Supreme Court, 1932)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
159 A. 19, 306 Pa. 204, 1932 Pa. LEXIS 423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bainbridge-v-merchants-miners-transportation-co-pa-1932.