Bain v. Tolley

Idaho Supreme Court

Bain v. Tolley

226 P. 1069, 39 Idaho 174, 1924 Ida. LEXIS 19

CourtIdaho Supreme Court

DecidedMay 27, 1924

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 226 P. 1069 (Bain v. Tolley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bain v. Tolley, 226 P. 1069, 39 Idaho 174, 1924 Ida. LEXIS 19 (Idaho 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

WM. E. LEE, J.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property. It was tried before the court, with a jury acting in an advisory capacity. The jury answered certain interrogatories favorably to respondent. The court made findings of fact and conclusions of law, and on December 29, 1921, made and entered judgment for respondent and against appellant.

The legislature has provided a method of taking appeals from the district court. An appeal is taken by filing with the clerk of the court in which the judgment or order appealed from is entered a notice of appeal, and serving a similar notice on the adverse party or his attorney. (C. S., sec. 7153.) The transcript in the instant case does not *175 contain anything purporting to be a copy of a notice of appeal; neither does it contain any evidence whatever that any notice of appeal has been served on the opposite party or his attorney, or filed in the district court. C. S., sec. 7163, provides that, on an appeal from a judgment, the appellant m/wst furnish this court with a copy of the notice of appeal. (See, also, C. S., secs. 7164 and 7165.) The furnishing to this court of a copy of the notice of appeal is necessary because the statute requires it, and also that this court may determine if any such notice was served upon the opposite party and filed in the lower court within the time provided. The jurisdiction of this court depends upon a compliance with these sections of the statute. (Richardson v. Banbury, ante, p. 1, 225 Pac. 1023; Green v. Morrison, 37 Ida. 420, 216 Pac. 1035; Kimzey v. Highland Livestock & Land Co., 37 Ida. 9, 214 Pac. 750; Davis v. Bach, 33 Ida. 551, 196 Pac. 673; Cook v. Miller, 30 Ida. 749, 168 Pac. 911; Stevens v. Hall, 9 Ida. 233, 73 Pac. 527; Adams v. McPherson, 3 Ida. 718, 34 Pac. 1095; Tootle v. French, 3 Ida. 1, 25 Pac. 1091; Caldwell v. Ruddy, 1 Ida. 760; Anderson v. Knott, 1 Ida. 626; People v. Lynch, 1 Ida. 358.)

The attempted appeal should be dismissed, and it is so ordered. Costs to respondent.

McCarthy, C. J., Budge and William A. Lee, JJ'., and A-dair, District Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WM. E. LEE, J.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property. It was tried before the court, with a jury acting in an advisory capacity. The jury answered certain interrogatories favorably to respondent. The court made findings of fact and conclusions of law, and on December 29, 1921, made and entered judgment for respondent and against appellant.

The legislature has provided a method of taking appeals from the district court. An appeal is taken by filing with the clerk of the court in which the judgment or order appealed from is entered a notice of appeal, and serving a similar notice on the adverse party or his attorney. (C. S., sec. 7153.) The transcript in the instant case does not *175 contain anything purporting to be a copy of a notice of appeal; neither does it contain any evidence whatever that any notice of appeal has been served on the opposite party or his attorney, or filed in the district court. C. S., sec. 7163, provides that, on an appeal from a judgment, the appellant m/wst furnish this court with a copy of the notice of appeal. (See, also, C. S., secs. 7164 and 7165.) The furnishing to this court of a copy of the notice of appeal is necessary because the statute requires it, and also that this court may determine if any such notice was served upon the opposite party and filed in the lower court within the time provided. The jurisdiction of this court depends upon a compliance with these sections of the statute. (Richardson v. Banbury, ante, p. 1, 225 Pac. 1023; Green v. Morrison, 37 Ida. 420, 216 Pac. 1035; Kimzey v. Highland Livestock & Land Co., 37 Ida. 9, 214 Pac. 750; Davis v. Bach, 33 Ida. 551, 196 Pac. 673; Cook v. Miller, 30 Ida. 749, 168 Pac. 911; Stevens v. Hall, 9 Ida. 233, 73 Pac. 527; Adams v. McPherson, 3 Ida. 718, 34 Pac. 1095; Tootle v. French, 3 Ida. 1, 25 Pac. 1091; Caldwell v. Ruddy, 1 Ida. 760; Anderson v. Knott, 1 Ida. 626; People v. Lynch, 1 Ida. 358.)

The attempted appeal should be dismissed, and it is so ordered. Costs to respondent.

McCarthy, C. J., Budge and William A. Lee, JJ'., and A-dair, District Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

226 P. 1069, 39 Idaho 174, 1924 Ida. LEXIS 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bain-v-tolley-idaho-1924.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack