Bain v. State

335 S.W.2d 607, 169 Tex. Crim. 513, 1960 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2999
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 30, 1960
DocketNo. 31,627
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 335 S.W.2d 607 (Bain v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bain v. State, 335 S.W.2d 607, 169 Tex. Crim. 513, 1960 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2999 (Tex. 1960).

Opinions

WOODLEY, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, 3 days in jail and a fine of $50.

The notice of appeal appearing in the transcript recites that the “defendant in open court gave notice of appeal to the Court of Civil Appeals, Austin, Texas.”

[514]*514The state moves to dismiss the appeal, citing Ex parte Moore, 109 Tex. Cr. R. 73, 3 S. W. 2d 86, which sustains its position that such notice did not confer jurisdiction of the appeal on this court.

The more recent decisions holding that the statute does not require the notice of appeal to specify the court to which notice of appeal is given recognize that the statute must be strictly complied with. Braun v. State, 158 Tex. Cr. R. 394, 257 S.W. 2d 708; Blackman v. State, 20 S.W. 2d 783; Casey v. State, 116 Tex. Cr. R. 111, 32 S.W. 2d 461.

Such holdings are consistent with Ex parte Moore, supra, which has not been overruled. See also Ayers v. State, 66 Tex. Cr. R. 281, 146 S.W. 171; Thomas et al v. State, 56 Tex. Cr. R. 246, 119 S.W. 846.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Broome v. State
169 Tex. Crim. 514 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
335 S.W.2d 607, 169 Tex. Crim. 513, 1960 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bain-v-state-texcrimapp-1960.