Bain v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Bain v. State

241 S.E.2d 586, 144 Ga. App. 470, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 1637

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 4, 1978

Docket54898

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 241 S.E.2d 586 (Bain v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bain v. State, 241 S.E.2d 586, 144 Ga. App. 470, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 1637 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Birdsong, Judge.

Motor vehicle theft. From a conviction by a jury of motor vehicle theft, Bain appeals. Held:

1. Appellant’s first enumeration of error raises the general grounds. " 'As to the general grounds, this court is bound by the "any evidence” rule and must accept the state’s version of the evidence, as was done by the jury and the trial judge. [Cit.]’ ” Dunn v. State, 141 Ga. App. 853 (234 SE2d 687). There was evidence to support the verdict; therefore, this enumeration is without merit.

2. Appellant contends that there is a fatal variance between the allegation in the indictment charging him with theft of a "1970 Plymouth Valiant . . . being the property of Sam Brigman,” and the proof presented at trial. The victim testified to his ownership of a 1970 Plymouth Duster, and identified the automobile in which appellant was apprehended as the vehicle stolen from him. The victim further testified that he owned no other automobiles. Appellant admitted to the police that he had taken the vehicle identified by the victim and stated that "he didn’t think it was stealing when the keys were left in the car.”

The indictment satisfied standards established in DePalma v. State, 225 Ga. 465, 469 (169 SE2d 801). See Dobbs v. State, 235 Ga. 800 (221 SE2d 576); Davis v. State, 139 Ga. App. 105 (227 SE2d 900). This contention is without merit.

3. Appellant enumerates as error the trial court’s refusal to direct a verdict of acquittal. A directed verdict of acquittal in a criminal case is proper only "where there is no conflict in the evidence.” Code Ann. § 27-1802. Where the jury has reached a verdict of guilty, and the verdict is supported by some evidence, a directed verdict of acquittal is not proper. Willingham v. State, 131 Ga. App. 851 (207 SE2d 249). See Merino v. State, 230 Ga. 604 (198 SE2d 311). This enumeration of error is without merit.

4. Appellant enumerates as error the trial court’s refusal to charge the jury, in the exact language requested by appellant, on circumstantial evidence. The trial court virtually quoted the appropriate statute, Code *471 Ann. § 38-109. The charge was sufficient. Hudson v. State, 237 Ga. 241 (227 SE2d 257).

Submitted November 3, 1977 Decided January 4, 1978. Twitty & Twitty, Jack G. Slover, Jr., for appellant. H. Lamar Cole, District Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., and Webb, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Birdsong, Judge.

Motor vehicle theft. From a conviction by a jury of motor vehicle theft, Bain appeals. Held:

1. Appellant’s first enumeration of error raises the general grounds. " 'As to the general grounds, this court is bound by the "any evidence” rule and must accept the state’s version of the evidence, as was done by the jury and the trial judge. [Cit.]’ ” Dunn v. State, 141 Ga. App. 853 (234 SE2d 687). There was evidence to support the verdict; therefore, this enumeration is without merit.

2. Appellant contends that there is a fatal variance between the allegation in the indictment charging him with theft of a "1970 Plymouth Valiant . . . being the property of Sam Brigman,” and the proof presented at trial. The victim testified to his ownership of a 1970 Plymouth Duster, and identified the automobile in which appellant was apprehended as the vehicle stolen from him. The victim further testified that he owned no other automobiles. Appellant admitted to the police that he had taken the vehicle identified by the victim and stated that "he didn’t think it was stealing when the keys were left in the car.”

The indictment satisfied standards established in DePalma v. State, 225 Ga. 465, 469 (169 SE2d 801). See Dobbs v. State, 235 Ga. 800 (221 SE2d 576); Davis v. State, 139 Ga. App. 105 (227 SE2d 900). This contention is without merit.

3. Appellant enumerates as error the trial court’s refusal to direct a verdict of acquittal. A directed verdict of acquittal in a criminal case is proper only "where there is no conflict in the evidence.” Code Ann. § 27-1802. Where the jury has reached a verdict of guilty, and the verdict is supported by some evidence, a directed verdict of acquittal is not proper. Willingham v. State, 131 Ga. App. 851 (207 SE2d 249). See Merino v. State, 230 Ga. 604 (198 SE2d 311). This enumeration of error is without merit.

4. Appellant enumerates as error the trial court’s refusal to charge the jury, in the exact language requested by appellant, on circumstantial evidence. The trial court virtually quoted the appropriate statute, Code *471 Ann. § 38-109. The charge was sufficient. Hudson v. State, 237 Ga. 241 (227 SE2d 257).

Submitted November 3, 1977 Decided January 4, 1978. Twitty & Twitty, Jack G. Slover, Jr., for appellant. H. Lamar Cole, District Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., and Webb, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

241 S.E.2d 586, 144 Ga. App. 470, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 1637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bain-v-state-gactapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack