Bain v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bain v. State

771 So. 2d 1292, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15512, 2000 WL 1759897

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 1, 2000

DocketNo. 5D00-614

StatusPublished

This text of 771 So. 2d 1292 (Bain v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bain v. State, 771 So. 2d 1292, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15512, 2000 WL 1759897 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm that portion of the trial court’s order precluding Deviral Bain from filing any further frivolous collateral pleadings attacking his judgment and sentence. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47, 47 (Fla.1999); Huffman v. State, 693 So.2d 570, 571 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

We must reverse as to that portion of the “Order Forfeiting Gain-Time Pursuant To Florida Statute § 944.28.” We note the trial court did not have the benefit of our supreme court’s decision in Hall v. State, 752 So.2d 575 (Fla.2000) when it entered its order. Hall precludes gain time forfeiture as a penalty for filing consecutive and frivolous Rule 3.800 and Rule 3.850 motions under the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. See id. at 580.

AFFIRMED IN PART; ORDER VACATED IN PART.

COBB, PETERSON and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI