Bain v. State
658 So. 2d 677, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8556, 1995 WL 478273
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bain v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 642 So. 2d 578 →
Opinion
We affirm Ivan Bain’s convictions for burglary of a conveyance, robbery, and resisting arrest without violence. The state properly concedes, however, that the trial court erred by imposing consecutive habitual offender sentences for offenses that occurred within a single criminal episode. Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 278, 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (Fla. 1994). We reverse and remand for resen-tencing in accordance with Hale.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bain v. State, 658 So. 2d 677, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8556, 1995 WL 478273 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
658 So. 2d 677 (Bain v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hale v. State
630 So. 2d 521 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)