Bain v. Goss

24 N.E. 361, 123 Ind. 511, 1890 Ind. LEXIS 236
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 3, 1890·No. No. 14,247·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Elliott, J.

The evidence is not in record, nor is the record made up under the provisions of the statute or the rules of the court in such a mode as to present the questions arising on the admission of evidence or the rulings upon instructions without the entire evidence, and the appeal can not be sustained. We have repeatedly indicated that we should be glad to have the record so made up as to present questions without incorporating the evidence, and we repeat that we should be glad to encourage such a practice. Jones v. Foley, 121 Ind. 180; Mercer v. Corbin, 117 Ind. 450.

It is, however, only where the record is properly made up under the statute or the rules of the court, that we can consider questions whiqji can not be fully undersood and decided without the evidence, in cases where the evidence is not in the record by a bill of exceptions. McCoy v. State, ex rel., 121 Ind. 160. This case belongs to that class.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bain v. Goss, 24 N.E. 361, 123 Ind. 511, 1890 Ind. LEXIS 236 (Ind. 1890).

24 N.E. 361 (Bain v. Goss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

PETTY, ETC. v. Friel
167 N.E.2d 345 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1960)
Chestnut v. Southern Indiana Railway Co.
62 N.E. 32 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1901)
Foultz v. State
56 N.E. 262 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1900)
Wright v. City of Crawfordsville
42 N.E. 227 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1895)
Evansville Suburban & Newburgh Railway Co. v. Lavender
34 N.E. 109 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1893)