Bain v. Charles Schad, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bain v. Charles Schad, Inc.

120 A.D.2d 633, 502 N.Y.S.2d 236, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56732

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 19, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 120 A.D.2d 633 (Bain v. Charles Schad, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bain v. Charles Schad, Inc., 120 A.D.2d 633, 502 N.Y.S.2d 236, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56732 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries in which the defendant Fleurant brought a third-party claim against his insurance carrier Great Atlantic Insurance Company, Fleurant appeals from a judgment of Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowd, J.), dated December 3, 1984, which dismissed the third-party complaint insofar as it is asserted against the third-party defendant Great Atlantic Insurance Company.

Judgment affirmed, with costs payable by Fleurant to the Great Atlantic Insurance Company.

We agree with the trial court’s finding that Fleurant knew or should have known of liability coverage upon which his claim was made. His delay of 5 Vi years in notifying his insurer was therefore unexcused inasmuch as it was unreasonable under the circumstances (see, Mighty Midgets v Centen[634]*634nial Ins. Co., 47 NY2d 12, 19). Since Fleurant failed to meet a condition of the policy, i.e., to notify the insurer of claim or suit "as soon as practicable”, the insurer’s duty to indemnify and defend was vitiated (see, Security Mut. Ins. Co. v Acker-Fitzsimons Corp., 31 NY2d 436, 440). Fleurant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Brown, J. P., Weinstein, Niehoff and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries in which the defendant Fleurant brought a third-party claim against his insurance carrier Great Atlantic Insurance Company, Fleurant appeals from a judgment of Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowd, J.), dated December 3, 1984, which dismissed the third-party complaint insofar as it is asserted against the third-party defendant Great Atlantic Insurance Company.

Judgment affirmed, with costs payable by Fleurant to the Great Atlantic Insurance Company.

We agree with the trial court’s finding that Fleurant knew or should have known of liability coverage upon which his claim was made. His delay of 5 Vi years in notifying his insurer was therefore unexcused inasmuch as it was unreasonable under the circumstances (see, Mighty Midgets v Centen[634]*634nial Ins. Co., 47 NY2d 12, 19). Since Fleurant failed to meet a condition of the policy, i.e., to notify the insurer of claim or suit "as soon as practicable”, the insurer’s duty to indemnify and defend was vitiated (see, Security Mut. Ins. Co. v Acker-Fitzsimons Corp., 31 NY2d 436, 440). Fleurant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Brown, J. P., Weinstein, Niehoff and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 A.D.2d 633, 502 N.Y.S.2d 236, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bain-v-charles-schad-inc-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack