Baily v. Snyder
This text of 8 Ind. 109 (Baily v. Snyder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause has been submitted since May 26,1855, and no brief furnished by the appellants. The error, if any, is waived
The judgment is affirmed with 7 per cent, damages and costs.
The counsel for the appellee in this case enforced the application of the rule that points not insisted on in the appellant’s brief will be deemed to be waived; and cited Seno v. The State, 6 Ind. R. 308; Pate v. Hull, id. 285; and Burton v. Braden, 4 Ind. R. 539.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Ind. 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baily-v-snyder-ind-1856.