Bailley v. All Persons Etc.

California Court of Appeal

Bailley v. All Persons Etc.

125 P. 939, 19 Cal. App. 274, 1912 Cal. App. LEXIS 45

California Court of Appeal·Decided June 15, 1912·No. Civ. No. 1025.·Published

Opinion

The questions involved herein are the same as those in the case of Bagley v. Bloom et al. (No. 1041), ante, p. 255, [125 P. 931], decided this day, and, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed therein, the judgment is affirmed.

Lennon, P. J., and Kerrigan, J., concurred.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on August 14, 1912.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The questions involved herein are the same as those in the case of Bagley v. Bloom et al. (No. 1041), ante, p. 255, [125 P. 931], decided this day, and, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed therein, the judgment is affirmed.

Lennon, P. J., and Kerrigan, J., concurred.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on August 14, 1912.

Bailley v. All Persons Etc., 125 P. 939, 19 Cal. App. 274, 1912 Cal. App. LEXIS 45 (Cal. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

125 P. 939 (Bailley v. All Persons Etc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related