Bailis v. Sickles
This text of 260 A.D. 1029 (Bailis v. Sickles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from an order granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment under rule 113, Rules of Civil Practice, and from a judgment entered pursuant thereto, in an action for damages consequent upon alleged illegal picketing of the plaintiffs by the defendants. Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Close, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
260 A.D. 1029, 24 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailis-v-sickles-nyappdiv-1940.