Bailis v. Sickles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bailis v. Sickles

260 A.D. 1029, 24 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5939

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 16, 1940·Published

Opinion

Appeal from an order granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment under rule 113, Rules of Civil Practice, and from a judgment entered pursuant thereto, in an action for damages consequent upon alleged illegal picketing of the plaintiffs by the defendants. Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment under rule 113, Rules of Civil Practice, and from a judgment entered pursuant thereto, in an action for damages consequent upon alleged illegal picketing of the plaintiffs by the defendants. Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Bailis v. Sickles, 260 A.D. 1029, 24 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5939 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

260 A.D. 1029 (Bailis v. Sickles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.