Bailey v. Woodlands Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bailey v. Woodlands Co.

696 So. 2d 459, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7582, 1997 WL 361821

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 2, 1997

DocketNo. 96-91

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 696 So. 2d 459 (Bailey v. Woodlands Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bailey v. Woodlands Co., 696 So. 2d 459, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7582, 1997 WL 361821 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

WOLF, Judge.

Appellants challenge the trial court’s authority to dismiss their amended counterclaim and third-party complaint with prejudice. We find that the trial court’s order finding a pattern of willful noneompliance or disregard of the rules of civil procedure complies with the requirements of Commonwealth Fed. Savings and Loan Ass’n v. Tubero, 569 So.2d 1271 (Fla.1990). Our review of the record also reveals no abuse of discretion in the judge’s decision to dismiss wheré there had been repeated discovery violations and the appellants had failed to comply with the latest order of the court concerning discovery notwithstanding the court’s imposition of monetary sanctions within the prior order.

The decision of the trial court is affirmed.

JOANOS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOLF, Judge.

Appellants challenge the trial court’s authority to dismiss their amended counterclaim and third-party complaint with prejudice. We find that the trial court’s order finding a pattern of willful noneompliance or disregard of the rules of civil procedure complies with the requirements of Commonwealth Fed. Savings and Loan Ass’n v. Tubero, 569 So.2d 1271 (Fla.1990). Our review of the record also reveals no abuse of discretion in the judge’s decision to dismiss wheré there had been repeated discovery violations and the appellants had failed to comply with the latest order of the court concerning discovery notwithstanding the court’s imposition of monetary sanctions within the prior order.

The decision of the trial court is affirmed.

JOANOS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

696 So. 2d 459, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7582, 1997 WL 361821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-woodlands-co-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack