Bailey v. Woodlands Co.

696 So. 2d 459, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7582, 1997 WL 361821
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 2, 1997·No. No. 96-91·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

WOLF, Judge.

Appellants challenge the trial court’s authority to dismiss their amended counterclaim and third-party complaint with prejudice. We find that the trial court’s order finding a pattern of willful noneompliance or disregard of the rules of civil procedure complies with the requirements of Commonwealth Fed. Savings and Loan Ass’n v. Tubero, 569 So.2d 1271 (Fla.1990). Our review of the record also reveals no abuse of discretion in the judge’s decision to dismiss wheré there had been repeated discovery violations and the appellants had failed to comply with the latest order of the court concerning discovery notwithstanding the court’s imposition of monetary sanctions within the prior order.

The decision of the trial court is affirmed.

JOANOS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bailey v. Woodlands Co., 696 So. 2d 459, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7582, 1997 WL 361821 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

696 So. 2d 459 (Bailey v. Woodlands Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

ICMfg & Associates, Inc. v. The Bare Board Group, Inc.
238 So. 3d 326 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Surf Tech International, Inc. v. Rutter
785 So. 2d 1280 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Clark v. Lake City Police Dept.
723 So. 2d 901 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)