Bailey v. Wayman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Bailey v. Wayman

50 A. 767, 201 Pa. 249, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 816

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 6, 1902·No. Appeal, No. 41·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Pee Ctjeiam,

The assignments of error relate to the charge of the court, to the answer to the plaintiff’s first point and to the answer to the defendant’s third point. Tn the answers to the points referred to we have not discerned any perceptible error, and the same may be said of the charge of the court. It follows that [252] no reason or cause appears for a reversal of the judgment entered by the court below.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Ctjeiam,

The assignments of error relate to the charge of the court, to the answer to the plaintiff’s first point and to the answer to the defendant’s third point. Tn the answers to the points referred to we have not discerned any perceptible error, and the same may be said of the charge of the court. It follows that [252] no reason or cause appears for a reversal of the judgment entered by the court below.

Judgment affirmed.

Bailey v. Wayman, 50 A. 767, 201 Pa. 249, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 816 (Pa. 1902).

Pincite

50 A. 767 (Bailey v. Wayman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related