Bailey v. Wayman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Bailey v. Wayman

50 A. 767, 201 Pa. 249, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 816

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 6, 1902

DocketAppeal, No. 41

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 50 A. 767 (Bailey v. Wayman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bailey v. Wayman, 50 A. 767, 201 Pa. 249, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 816 (Pa. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Ctjeiam,

The assignments of error relate to the charge of the court, to the answer to the plaintiff’s first point and to the answer to the defendant’s third point. Tn the answers to the points referred to we have not discerned any perceptible error, and the same may be said of the charge of the court. It follows that [252]*252no reason or cause appears for a reversal of the judgment entered by the court below.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Ctjeiam,

The assignments of error relate to the charge of the court, to the answer to the plaintiff’s first point and to the answer to the defendant’s third point. Tn the answers to the points referred to we have not discerned any perceptible error, and the same may be said of the charge of the court. It follows that [252]*252no reason or cause appears for a reversal of the judgment entered by the court below.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A. 767, 201 Pa. 249, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-wayman-pa-1902.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack