Bailey v. Warden

20 Johns. 129
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1822·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have decided that an attorney is not good bail, if excepted to; and, for the same reason, we think a Sheriff ought not to become bail; and such is the rule of the English Courts, which do not allow any person concerned in the process of the Court to become bail. We, therefore, grant the motion,

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bailey v. Warden, 20 Johns. 129 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1822).

20 Johns. 129 (Bailey v. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Banks v. McDivitt
2 F. Cas. 759 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1875)