Home/New York Supreme Court/Bailey v. Warden

Bailey v. Warden

20 Johns. 129
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1822
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 Johns. 129 (Bailey v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bailey v. Warden, 20 Johns. 129 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1822).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have decided that an attorney is not good bail, if excepted to; and, for the same reason, we think a Sheriff ought not to become bail; and such is the rule of the English Courts, which do not allow any person concerned in the process of the Court to become bail. We, therefore, grant the motion,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Banks v. McDivitt
2 F. Cas. 759 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1875)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 Johns. 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-warden-nysupct-1822.