Bailey v. Wakeman

New York Supreme Court

Bailey v. Wakeman

2 Denio 220

DecidedDecember 15, 1845

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Denio 220 (Bailey v. Wakeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bailey v. Wakeman, 2 Denio 220 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).

Pincite

Opinion

No member of the court moving for a postponement of the decision and no opinion being offered to be given, the President put the question, “Shall this judgment be reversed?” upon Which the members voted as follows:

[224]*224For reversal: The President, the Chancellor, and Senators Backus, Barlow, Bartlit, Beeiiman, Bockee, Burnham, Chamberlain, Clark, Denniston, Deyo, Emmons, Hand, Johnson, Jones, Lott, Mitchell, Porter, Scovil, Smith, Talcott, Yarney, Wright—24.

For affirmance: Senator Beers.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

No member of the court moving for a postponement of the decision and no opinion being offered to be given, the President put the question, “Shall this judgment be reversed?” upon Which the members voted as follows:

[224]*224For reversal: The President, the Chancellor, and Senators Backus, Barlow, Bartlit, Beeiiman, Bockee, Burnham, Chamberlain, Clark, Denniston, Deyo, Emmons, Hand, Johnson, Jones, Lott, Mitchell, Porter, Scovil, Smith, Talcott, Yarney, Wright—24.

For affirmance: Senator Beers.

Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Denio 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-wakeman-nysupct-1845.