Bailey v. Wakeman

1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 161

This text of 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 161 (Bailey v. Wakeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bailey v. Wakeman, 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 161 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).

Opinion

The Supreme Court held the evidence admissible, and denied the motion, holding the letter admissible as a part of the res gesta, to show that the purchase was an individual transaction of Tail!, the deceased partner. But on writ of error from this judgment,

The Court of Errors held that the letter of the partner who purchased the draft was not competent evidence for the plaintiffs as a part of the res gesta to prove the purchase an individual transaction of Vaill, nor for any purpose whatever as evidence in their favor; and the judgment of the Supreme Court was reversed by a vote of 24 to 1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-wakeman-nycterr-1799.