Bailey v. Vitagraph-Lubin-Selig-Essanay Inc.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Bailey v. Vitagraph-Lubin-Selig-Essanay Inc.

94 S.E. 554, 147 Ga. 450, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 259

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedDecember 13, 1917

DocketNo. 426

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 94 S.E. 554 (Bailey v. Vitagraph-Lubin-Selig-Essanay Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bailey v. Vitagraph-Lubin-Selig-Essanay Inc., 94 S.E. 554, 147 Ga. 450, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 259 (Ga. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

In a suit for unliquidated damages the jury are not com-

pelled to find the amount testified to by witnesses, though it be uncontroverted, where the amount is fixed by the opinion of the witness giving the testimony. Applying this rule to the present case, the verdict was not demanded, and the judgment granting a first new trial will not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI