Bailey v. Vitagraph-Lubin-Selig-Essanay Inc.
94 S.E. 554, 147 Ga. 450, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 259
Opinion
In a suit for unliquidated damages the jury are not com-
pelled to find the amount testified to by witnesses, though it be uncontroverted, where the amount is fixed by the opinion of the witness giving the testimony. Applying this rule to the present case, the verdict was not demanded, and the judgment granting a first new trial will not be disturbed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bailey v. Vitagraph-Lubin-Selig-Essanay Inc., 94 S.E. 554, 147 Ga. 450, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 259 (Ga. 1917).
94 S.E. 554 (Bailey v. Vitagraph-Lubin-Selig-Essanay Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Highway Department v. Andrus
95 S.E.2d 781 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1956)
Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Jackson
23 S.E.2d 191 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)