Bailey v. Sutton
2 F. Cas. 385, 1 Cranch 551
This text of 2 F. Cas. 385 (Bailey v. Sutton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bailey v. Sutton, 2 F. Cas. 385, 1 Cranch 551 (circtddc 1809).
Opinion
After the rule to plead has expired, the court will not compel the plaintiff to produce his cause of action.
At law. Assumpsit against the defendants as acceptors of a bill of exchange. The rule to plead expired on the third day of this term.
moved to compel the plaintiff to produce his cause of action.
Refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 F. Cas. 385, 1 Cranch 551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-sutton-circtddc-1809.