Bailey v. Stevens
This text of 9 Rob. 158 (Bailey v. Stevens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an action instituted by the proprietor of a plantation and slaves, against an overseer, who is charged with brutal treatment of the slaves, during the absence of the plaintiff, and other gross violations of duty, whereby the plaintiff, it is alleged, suffered heavy damage. There was a verdict and judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiff appealed. "
A perusal of the evidence which comes up with the record, is far from reconciling our minds to the finding of the jury. On the contrary, we think justice requires that the case should be remanded for a new trial.
It is, therefore, ordered and decreed, that the judgment of the District Court be annulled and reversed, that the verdict be set aside, and the case remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 Rob. 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-stevens-la-1844.