Bailey v. State
225 S.W. 515
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bailey v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 97 Tex. Crim. 312 →
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of theft and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.
As the record presents the appeal, there is nothing this court can intelligently revise, there being neither bills of exception nor statement of facts. The case on its face seems to be sufficient, in the absence of some pertinent matter properly presented for revision.
The judgment will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bailey v. State, 225 S.W. 515 (Tex. 1920).
225 S.W. 515 (Bailey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.