Bailey v. State

1910 OK CR 8, 106 P. 348, 3 Okla. Crim. 366, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 147
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedJanuary 11, 1910
DocketNo. A-86.
StatusPublished

This text of 1910 OK CR 8 (Bailey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bailey v. State, 1910 OK CR 8, 106 P. 348, 3 Okla. Crim. 366, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 147 (Okla. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Notice of appeal was not served upon the county attorney or upon the clerk of the court in which the judg- •, ment was rendered, as is required by. section 6949 of Snyder’s Comp. Laws Okla. 1909.

' The state’s motion to dismiss the appeal. upon this ground must therefore be sustained. Boneparte v. State, ante, p. 345, 106 Pac. 347.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boneparte v. United States
1910 OK CR 3 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1910 OK CR 8, 106 P. 348, 3 Okla. Crim. 366, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-state-oklacrimapp-1910.