Bailey v. State

817 S.W.2d 601, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1373, 1991 WL 173259
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bailey v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 712
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 10, 1991·No. No. 59075·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from an order denying his Rule 29.15 motion on the merits following an evidentiary hearing. The trial court’s judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bailey v. State, 817 S.W.2d 601, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1373, 1991 WL 173259 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

817 S.W.2d 601 (Bailey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.