Bailey v. State
This text of 111 So. 586 (Bailey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is an appeal from a conviction of assault and battery, and the appellant’s complaint is that the indictment on which he was tried, and which the reporter will set out in full, was fatally defective in that it failed to charge *593 the intent with which the alleged assault was made. The ground of the contention is that between the words ‘ ‘ malice aforethought” and the words ‘‘kill and murder,” there should have been written the word “to” instead of the word “did.” This, of course, is true if the indictment was intended to charge an assault and battery with intent to kill and murder. The use of the word “did” was probably a clerical error. Leaving out of view the fact that the indictment probably charges the appellant with the crime of murder, and, if so, that he could be convicted thereunder of assault and battery, section 1499, Code of 1906 (Hemingway’s Code, section 1257), the indictment does charge an assault and battery in appropriate and technical language; and, if it fails to charge that the assault was committed with intent to kill and murder, the appellant cannot complain thereat, since he was convicted of assault and battery only.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
111 So. 586, 146 Miss. 588, 1927 Miss. LEXIS 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-state-miss-1927.