Bailey v. State

176 S.E. 909, 50 Ga. App. 92, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 635
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 2, 1934·No. 24322·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

1. “It is a constitutional right of a defendant in a criminal case to have the benefit of counsel (Civil Code, § 6361) ; but he can waive this right. If the record shows that the accused did not have counsel, it is not cause for a new trial, unless it further appears that the right to have counsel was denied him.” Gatlin v. State, 17 Ga. App. 406 (87 S. E. 151). It does irot appear from the record in this case that the accused was denied his constitutional right to have counsel. The case of Cook v. State, 48 Ga. App. 224 (172 S. E. 471), cited by counsel for the plaintiff in error, is distinguished by its particular facts from the Gatlin ease, supra, and the instant case.

[93]*93Decided November 2, 1934.

2. The court sufficiently instructed the jury upon the law of circumstantial evidence.

3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur. Willis Smith, for plaintiff in error. Emmett Smith, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bailey v. State, 176 S.E. 909, 50 Ga. App. 92, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 635 (Ga. Ct. App. 1934).

176 S.E. 909 (Bailey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Abbott v. State
85 S.E.2d 615 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)
Harris v. Norris
4 S.E.2d 840 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)