Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Bailey v. State

Bailey v. State

100 S.E. 754, 24 Ga. App. 353, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 650
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bailey v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 23 Ga. App. 146 →
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 4, 1919·No. 10858·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. Under the facts of the case the court did not err in overruling the defendant’s motion for a continuance of the case.

2. The evidence amply authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodworih, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bailey v. State, 100 S.E. 754, 24 Ga. App. 353, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 650 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

100 S.E. 754 (Bailey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.