Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bailey v. State

Bailey v. State

126 So. 3d 1170, 2012 WL 3192792, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13196
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bailey v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16554 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 8, 2012·No. No. 4D11-3971·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. Appellant is not entitled to presentence jail [1171]*1171credit for time spent on house arrest. Licata v. State, 788 So.2d 1063 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

Affirmed.

POLEN, GROSS and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bailey v. State, 126 So. 3d 1170, 2012 WL 3192792, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13196 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

126 So. 3d 1170 (Bailey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Licata v. State
788 So. 2d 1063 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)