Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bailey v. State

Bailey v. State

996 So. 2d 967, 2008 WL 5391927
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bailey v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 931 So. 2d 224 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 24, 2008·No. 1D07-6070·Published

Opinion

996 So.2d 967 (2008)

Scott Bradley BAILEY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D07-6070.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 24, 2008.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Phil Patterson, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Michael T. Kennett and Thomas D. Winokur, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Scott Bradley Bailey, appeals from his judgment and sentence. We affirm. We note, however, that Appellant has raised an issue on appeal over which we do not have jurisdiction. See Wild v. Dozier, 672 So.2d 16 (Fla.1996); Sanders v. State, 881 So.2d 63 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). As such, this opinion is not dispositive as to that issue.

AFFIRMED.

WEBSTER, DAVIS, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bailey v. State, 996 So. 2d 967, 2008 WL 5391927 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

996 So. 2d 967 (Bailey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sanders v. State
881 So. 2d 63 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Wild v. Dozier
672 So. 2d 16 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)