Bailey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bailey v. State

196 So. 2d 755, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5056

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 21, 1967

DocketNo. 66-570

StatusPublished

This text of 196 So. 2d 755 (Bailey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bailey v. State, 196 So. 2d 755, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5056 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was adjudged guilty and sentenced to the State Penitentiary for a term of one year on the charge of buying, receiving or concealing stolen property-well knowing same to be stolen. Trial was had before the court without a jury-on defendant’s plea of not guilty and waiver of jury trial.

Defendant contends on appeal that the-trial court’s finding of guilty is not supported by the evidence and that the court erred in denying defendant’s motion for additional time to file a supplement to his-oral motion for a new trial.

We have carefully considered all of appellant’s contentions in the light of the record and briefs, and have found them' to be without merit. Therefore, the judgment and sentence appealed is affirmed^

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was adjudged guilty and sentenced to the State Penitentiary for a term of one year on the charge of buying, receiving or concealing stolen property-well knowing same to be stolen. Trial was had before the court without a jury-on defendant’s plea of not guilty and waiver of jury trial.

Defendant contends on appeal that the-trial court’s finding of guilty is not supported by the evidence and that the court erred in denying defendant’s motion for additional time to file a supplement to his-oral motion for a new trial.

We have carefully considered all of appellant’s contentions in the light of the record and briefs, and have found them' to be without merit. Therefore, the judgment and sentence appealed is affirmed^

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 So. 2d 755, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5056, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-state-fladistctapp-1967.