Bailey v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Bailey v. State

103 So. 921, 20 Ala. App. 671

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 17, 1925

Docket8 Div. 239.

StatusPublished

This text of 103 So. 921 (Bailey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bailey v. State, 103 So. 921, 20 Ala. App. 671 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The indictment upon which this defendant was tried and convicted charged him with grand larceny; the specific offense being that he feloniously took and carried away a suit case, which, with the contents, was of the value of $40, the personal property of Mrs. Nellie Angel. There was a general verdict of guilty, and the defendant was duly sentenced to an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary for not less than three years nor more than four years. From the judgment he appealed. The appeal is upon the record proper, there being no bill of exceptions. The trial judge certifies to this court that the time for presenting a bill of exceptions has expired, and that no bill of exceptions has been presented to him. An examination of the record discloses it to be regular in all respects. No error being apparent thereon, the judgment of conviction appealed from is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

The indictment upon which this defendant was tried and convicted charged him with grand larceny; the specific offense being that he feloniously took and carried away a suit case, which, with the contents, was of the value of $40, the personal property of Mrs. Nellie Angel. There was a general verdict of guilty, and the defendant was duly sentenced to an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary for not less than three years nor more than four years. From the judgment he appealed. The appeal is upon the record proper, there being no bill of exceptions. The trial judge certifies to this court that the time for presenting a bill of exceptions has expired, and that no bill of exceptions has been presented to him. An examination of the record discloses it to be regular in all respects. No error being apparent thereon, the judgment of conviction appealed from is affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 So. 921, 20 Ala. App. 671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-state-alactapp-1925.